Transport Strike – Feb 27, 2017 – Jeepney phase out & plight of drivers

It’s true, transport groups will hold another transport strike on Monday, February 27. 2017 beginning at 6AM, it is being organized by transport groups PISTON, STOP and GO Coalition, and No To Jeepney Phase Out Coalition (NJPOC). According to the groups, their fellow drivers and operators will also hold a transport strike in the following cities nationwide including Baguio City, Cebu City, Iloilo City, Tacloban City, and Cagayan de Oro City.

Phase out of 15-year old PUJs and PUBs

The transport strike is in protest of the planned phase out of Public Utility Jeeps and Buses that are over 15 years of age. This was laid down in DOTC Order 2002-03 which is further implemented by LTFRB Resolution No 2013-01 which basically mandates that PUB and PUJ units that are 15 years of age and over would no longer be given a Certificate of Public Convenience essentially removing these vehicles off our roads.

LTFRB spokesperson Aileen Lizada said the phase out of old jeepneys is part of the government program to “modernize” public transport. In place of the old jeeps that run on diesel, the government is pushing the promotion of e-jeeps which run on eletricity.

To help drivers and operators make the switch to E-jeepneys, Lizada said the government would buy the old jeeps and offer loans to help with the purchase. Which seems fair and reasonable, though I haven’t come across any news report or publicly available information about the details of this loan and ‘buy back’ scheme of the government.

Loss of livelihood

Transport groups fear that since most of the jeeps they use are over 15 years old, despite being in good road-worthy conditions, a lot from their sector would lose their means of livelihood. The e-jeep being offered by the government are too expensive for small operators to buy. They also have doubts about its reliability and mileage. Even with loans from the government, the E-jeeps would only contribute to an increase in fares as the costs would be passed on to the commuters. And with the additional requirements for operators to have at least 10 units to avail of the loans, this will only force the small operators out of business and deprive them of a means of living.

Public safety vs means of livelihood

The government claims that the phase out of old jeeps is to ensure the commuters have a safe public transport. Statistics on road safety, in particular, accidents involving PUJs are not readily available online. The only stats I’ve managed to find is from a post by Top Gear from data gathered by DOTC in 2012! The bit of statistics relevant to road safety are as follows:

79% – Road crash fatalities caused by driver error

11% – Road crash fatalities caused by defective vehicles

With no data on how many of these road accidents due to defective vehicles involved public utility jeepneys, we really can’t say if 15-year-old jeepneys are really a safety risk for the riding public. Given that there are far more road accidents caused by driver error. one could say it doesn’t matter if your vehicle is old or brand new.

Mr. George San Mateo, national president of the militant Pagkakaisa ng mga Samahan ng Tsuper at Opereytor Nationwide (Piston) in an article by Fred Dabu in UP Forum, explains why jeep drivers are among the poor and vulnerable of our society:

“Ang mga jeepney driver ay ‘mala-manggagawa’ kumpara sa mga bus driver na ‘manggagawa’ kasi may employee-employer relationship sa mga bus company habang walang employee-employer relationship sa mga jeepney driver. Karamihan dating magsasaka, iniwan ang lupa at pumunta sa sentrong lunsod.”

He went on to add:

San Mateo estimated the daily gross income of jeepney drivers on a 24-hour-run at Php500-600 or only equivalent to a Php250 per day take-home income for a 12-hour-shift, an amount way below the minimum wage standard for workers. He said there was no standard “boundary” or amount given to the jeepney operator. “Walang fixed amount, depende sa usapan, depende sa seating capacity, route, sitwasyon ng trapik.” For instance, short routes would require payments for operators as low as Php600 while long routes would require Php1,000 or more as boundary for a 24-hour-run.

The struggle for a more just means of ‘modernizing’ the public transport sector against the rights of the jeep drivers and operators to make a living has reached the Court of Appeals where in August of 2016 it sided with the government ruling that in the name public safety, the government’s right to police and regulate public transport must prevail over the rights of the few to earn a living.

Hence the transport strike, the 2nd this February, that will take place tomorrow.

Sympathize with the jeep drivers and operators

Tomorrow will be another difficult day for many of us commuters. While some schools have already announced class cancellations for tomorrow to spare their students and faculty of the inconvenience the transport strike would cause, it does nothing to address the issue. Sure some of us would be able to take a taxi, an Uber, a GrabCar to get to work tomorrow all while being annoyed and angry at the striking jeepney drivers, it also does nothing to solve the issue.

While we will be inconvenienced tomorrow by the transport strike, take a minute to think that the striking drivers would sacrifice a day of earnings to send their message across and to call out attention to their cause: if the government will have its way, they would lose their livelihood. There will be lesser jeepneys to go around, commuting will be a lot more difficult and costly even after the transport strike.

This issue is not just about old jeepneys, it’s about the terrible mess that our public transport has become. There’s a better way of modernizing our public transport. It doesn’t have to be just about the safety of the commuting public over the livelihood of drivers and operators.

More questions than answers – Lascanas retraction, EDSA people power, Duterte’s ouster


Update: Hours after this post was published, the Senate through a vote of 10 Senators in favor against 7 who opposed, to refer Sen Trillanes’ motion to re-open the hearings on the Davao Death Squad to the Committee on public order and dangerous drugs chaired by Sen Lacson. The Senate will then meet again to discuss on how to handle Sen Trillanes’ resolution.

Yesterday, in a press conference at the Senate, lawyers from the Free Legal Assistance Group and Sen Antonio Trillanes IV accompanied former police officer SPO3 Arthur Lascanas where he made public the confession that the ‘Davao Death Squad’ was real, he was its leader and former Davao City Mayor now President Rodrigo Duterte was behind the DDS.

A complete turnaround of his previous testimony in a Senate investigation into the Davao Death Squad back in September 2016, that, at that time, he belied the testimony of self-confessed DDS member Edgar Matobato.

Media reports say that ‘in genral‘, Lascanas and Matobato’s testimonies match.

First question that comes to mind: Why has Lascanas retracted his earlier testimony? For sure, his lawyers from FLAG has advised that he will expose himself to perjury charges, not to mention earn the ire of Duterte’s loyal supporters. What made him change his tune? Was he being pressured back in September to deny the existence of the Davao Death Squad? Who was putting the pressure?

Will the Senate re-open its investigation into the Davao Death Squad? Sen Trillanes has already filed a resolution to do so, yet Sen Dick Gordon, chairman of the Senate committee Justice and Human rights which conducted the September investigation has given the thumbs down. For him, this matter should now be brought to before the courts.

Which brings us to the next question, can Duterte be sued for the alleged serious crimes before he became President? In other words, would Presidential immunity necessitate his impeachment first, before he can be properly charged for the murders that the so-called Davao Death Squad committed thru his orders?

This brings to mind a discussion on the Presidential or executive immunity by constitutional expert Fr Joaquin Bernas, SJ where he cited landmark cases decided by the US Supreme Court that dealt with its limits. He then moved on to a similar case closer to home: the prosecution of former President Joseph Estrada for the alleged plunder during his term, and whether he still had immunity after he has be removed from office since the alleged crimes took place while he was President. Our own Supreme Court ruled against Estrada but I don’t think it squarely applies to Duterte’s case as the allegations: murder of which he was allegedly the mastermind, are criminal offenses that took place before he became President. It seems this issue will also end up before the Supreme Court.

Going back to the impeachment of Duterte, this will not happen, yet, as he still enjoys the support of the supermajority in the Lower House. Who knows, the ever-reliable Lozano may yet again beat everyone to the punch by filing an impeachment case only to be rejected by Duterte’s allies in Congress giving the President another year of being shielded from impeachment.

What about extra-constitutional means of removing Duterte from power? Talk is ripe about a planned ouster of President Duterte that will coincide with the upcoming celebration of the EDSA People Power’s 31st anniversary. Would this happen? Is this the reason why this year’s program of commemorating the EDSA revolution has been toned down by the Palace and held within the safe walls of Camp Aguinaldo?

And what does Sec Martin Andanar knows that National Security Adviser Hermogenes Esperon and National Defense Secretary Delfin Lorenzana doesn’t that he’s the only government official that’s been vocal about these so-called plans of removing Duterte from the Presidency? The press has already had its field day with Sec Andanar regarding this issue, yet the question still stands: what is the basis for his claims?

Or is this the administration’s tactic of handling the recent retraction and accusation of Lascanas? For now, we don’t know if what he has told yesterday at the Senate, that Duterte was behind the Davao Death Squad after all, or is just really another push by those who want Duterte out of power?

The lawyers from FLAG, now the laywers of Lascanas, are battle-tested lawyers for justice, human rights and accountability. They would not take on Lascanas if they think he doesn’t have the goods or he is not credible.

What will happen next? Only time will tell.

Image by ABS-BCN News

How bad is the COMELEC data breach?

Back in March 27, 2016 hackers under the banner, Anonymous Philippines hacked into the website of the Commission on Elections defaced it to demonstrate how weak the poll body’s online security measures are. A few days later, another group of hackers LulzSec Pilipinas made available online the entire database of COMELEC – 338GB in size containing information of more than 55 million voters.

COMELEC Chair Andres Bautista said that no confidential information was leaked. COMELEC has downplayed the scale of the data breach to allay fears that it could compromise the results of the 2016 elections. While a valid concern and the election results were untainted, it brushed aside the other equally great risk for the millions of registered voters whose personal identifiable information has been compromised.

The newly established National Privacy Commission has just finished its investigation of the data breach and had made public the types of personal data that has been made available to anyone online including criminals:

“The voter database in the Precinct Finder application contained each voter’s complete name, date of birth, gender, civil status, address, precinct number, birthplace, disability, voter identification number, voter registration record number, reason for deletion/deactivation, registration date, and update time.”

“The voter database in the Precinct Finder application contained information on each voter’s verified name, date of birth, gender, civil status, post of registration, passport information, with number and expiry date, taxpayer identification number, e-mail address, mailing address, spouse’ name, the complete names of the voter’s mother and father, the voter’s addresses in the Philippines and abroad, post or country of registration, old registration information, Philippine representative’s complete name, citizenship, registration assistor, profession, sector, height and weight, identifying marks, biometrics description, voting history, mode of voting, and other textual reference information for the voter registration system.” the decision further reads, depicting how much personal data are now most likely in the hands of criminal elements as a result of the COMELEC data breach.

Here’s a rundown of the personal identifiable information that has been leaked:

  • voter’s verified name
  • date of birth
  • gender
  • civil status
  • post of registration
  • precinct number
  • birthplace
  • disability
  • voter identification number
  • voter registration record number
  • reason for deletion/deactivation
  • registration date and update time
  • passport information with number and expiry date
  • taxpayer identification number
  • e-mail address
  • mailing address
  • spouse’ name
  • complete names of the voter’s mother and father
  • voter’s addresses in the Philippines and abroad
  • post or country of registration
  • old registration information
  • Philippine representative’s complete name
  • citizenship
  • registration assistor
  • profession
  • sector
  • height and weight
  • identifying marks
  • biometrics description
  • voting history
  • mode of voting
  • other textual reference information for the voter registration system

To criminals who is into identity theft, use of forged documents and IDs, impersonation, blackmail and harassment, the COMELEC data leak is a gold mine.
If you’re a registered voter, you are vulnerable to hacking of your social media and other online accounts, identity theft which would compromise your bank accounts, utilities, academic or professional records, etc it could even be used to manipulate the next elections.

The NPC is just right in recommending the filing of criminal charges against COMELEC Chair Andres Bautista as he is liable for this catastrophic violation of Republic Act No 10173 or the Data Privacy Act of 2012.

I don’t know how else to say it, but this has really got me scared.

Cavite Number Coding Scheme

Cavite number coding scheme

It’s now official. Starting January 9, 2017 the Number Coding Scheme in the Province of Cavite will start its dry run. During the dry run period, only warning tickets will be given to violators. Strict implementation will begin on February 1, 2017 so full penalties and fines will be imposed.

It follows the same schedule in Metro Manila based on the license and conduction sticker ending in the following numbers:

  • 1 and 2: Monday
  • 3 and 4: Tuesday
  • 5 and 6: Wednesday
  • 7 and 8: Thursday
  • 9 and 0: Friday
  • The number coding scheme is in effect during the following time windows: 6AM to 9AM and 3PM to 7PM. It applies to all private cars, vans, motorcycles and trucks. The roads covered by the number scheme are as follows:

    Aguinaldo Highway – covering the stretch of Bacoor to Dasmarinas-Silang boundary
    Governor’s Drive – covering the stretch of Carmona to Trece Martires City-Tanza boundary
    Molino-Salawag-Paliparan Road – from Zapote, Bacoor, to Paliparan, Dasmarinas
    Molino Boulevard – covering Talaba 4, Niog 3, Ligas 2, Ligas 3, Bayanan, Mambog 4, Molino 2, Molino 3, San Nicolas 1, and San Nicolas 3 in Bacoor.
    Daang Hari Road – covering the stretch of Aguinaldo Highway, Imus to Molino, Bacoor


    • All public utility vehicles – jeeps and buses
    • Ambulance, firetrucks, police patrol cars, military vehicles with permanent marking indicating the vehicles as such. Privately owned firetrucks and ambulances are also exempted.
    • Vehicles carrying person/s needing immediate medical attention
    • Government vehicles with government plates
    • Vehicles delivering perishable goods in commercial quantity, which include fresh vegetables, fruits and flowers; raw meat and fresh seafood; ice products; baked products with shelf life of 24 hours; medicine/vaccine expiring within 24 hours; and cooked food/catering
    • Vehicles used by medical practitioner in an emergency
    • Duly franchised school buses and company shuttle service vehicles
    • Vehicles on mission to carry relief goods to identified calamity or highly depressed areas.

    Violators will be fined Php 300.00

    Will this number coding scheme solve the horrendous traffic situation in Cavite? Let’s wait and see…


    From ‘Free tuition in SCUs’ to ‘not available to all’

    Oblation - UP Diliman by Deondre Ng

    When news broke out that Php 8 billion pesos has been allotted to the Commission on Higher Education’s 2017 budget to allow for free tuition in State Colleges and Universities, the public broke out in celebration. At long last, the dream of a free higher education which the people specially the youth have long struggled for, was at hand.

    KABATAAN Partylist even hailed the move as a ‘game-changer‘:

    The Filipino youth celebrates and embraces this development, which potentially makes the Philippines at par with some of the great nations of the world – including Norway, Sweden, Finland, and Germany – when it comes to providing for free tuition in state schools.

    Part of the statement was warning, that now it seems, turned out to be prophetic:

    We must do everything in our power to have it implemented quickly and with a positive effect on students and the SUC community

    How so? It turns out that when Duterte affixed his signature to the 2017 budget, he vetoed some items and put others under “conditional implementation“:

    Yet, as with all new programs, there is a need to safeguard the proper implementation of the provision of free tuition fee. It is important to underscore that we must give priority to financially disadvantaged but academically able students.

    CHED was quick to dance the President’s tune and clarified what would the “conditional implementation” be actually like, according to CHED chair Patricia Licuanan:

    To bring the country closer to the reality of free college education, the commission will work overtime to ensure that the wisdom and specific intentions of lawmakers will be accurately reflected in the free tuition guidelines it is set to create.

    It will be guided by fairness, cost recovery and alignment of incentives. CHED will ensure that the wide-reaching implications of this major reform in Higher Education will be brought about effectively, and any negative consequences will be minimized.

    She may not have spelled it out, but it means that the Php 8 billion peso fund will no longer cover the tuition fee for all students in state Colleges and Universities, it will be used to further implement the ‘socialized tuition system’ and other scholarship programs in UP and other SCUs. No blanket free tuition for all.

    With this, celebrations for free higher education may have to be cut short as these recent developments need the further vigilance and scrutiny of the public specially the youth. Php 8 billion is no small fund. It must be used as intended, to provide for free tuition in state colleges and universities. More on this in the following days.

    Image by Deondre Ng

    Facebook users in the Philippines can now report links as fake news

    Finally! With the rise of social media and the dominance of Facebook came the rise of hoax stories or fake news stories/articles which in turn was used as propaganda for hate, discrimination, abuses and manipulation of public opinion. In response, Facebook introduced a feature back in January 20, 2016 which allowed users to flag or report a news story as a hoax or fake. This feature back then was only available to users in the United States. Erich Owens, Software Engineer, and Udi Weinsberg, Research Scientist for Facebook explained in a post:

    We’re always looking to people on Facebook to tell us how we can improve this experience. We’ve heard from people that they want to see fewer stories that are hoaxes, or misleading news. Today’s update to News Feed reduces the distribution of posts that people have reported as hoaxes and adds an annotation to posts that have received many of these types of reports to warn others on Facebook.

    Now it’s available for users in the Philippines where the proliferation of fake news stories have become the weapon of choice for political operatives in influencing public opinion and the national discussion whether they are supportive of President Rodrigo Roa Duterte and his much criticized and controversial war on illegal drugs and recently, his ordering of the late dictator Ferdinand Marcos’ burial at the Libingan ng mga Bayani, a national shrine for its fallen heroes, or critical of his policies.

    Various personalities and groups have taken to Facebook to drum up support for Duterte or voice their criticisms which is important in a democracy. However, things have become out of hand as both supporters and critics have directly or indirectly used and produced fake news stories for their cause. In the end though, the level and quality of public discourse has suffered. As manipulation of information, statistics, photos even blatant fabrication of fake stories and lies has led to abuse and widening of divisions and disagreements, hatred and mass psychosis. It has become harder to tell what is true from what is a lie.

    To report a link on Facebook as fake news:

    1) Click on the “v” menu in the upper-right corner of the post. A menu pops up, choose “Report post”
    Fake news on Facebook

    2) Choose “I think it shouldn’t be on Facebook.”

    3) Now select “It’s a false news story.”

    4) Next options for unfriending, unfollowing or completely blocking your friend or page that posted the hoax or fake news. There’s even an option of messaging your friend to let him or her know that you think the link is hoax or fake.

    Good job! You just helped Facebook identify which content is a hoax or fake news. The links you report won’t be deleted but will be marked with a message warning people that many others on Facebook have reported it. Hopefully, this will help in cleaning up our news feeds and taking back the Internet.

    Andres Bonifacio: Sa Marahas Na Manga Anak Nang Bayan

    To commemorate the 153rd birth anniversary of Andres Bonifacio, Father of the Philippine Revolution of 1896, I share the full text of one of the manifestos, issued in his name to the Katipuneros after suffering a series of defeats from the Spanish advances in Silang, Zapote and Batangas sometime between February and March 1897:

    Sa Marahas Na Manga Anak Nang Bayan:
    Ang inyong ipinakilalang katapangan sa pakikihamok sa kaaway na mga Kastila buhat pa ng simulan itong panghihimagsik, ay siyang nagsasabing mataas na di ninyo ikinasisindak ang ugong ng paghahanda at pagsalakay dito ng hukbong akay ni Polavieja, na sa kaunting pan ahon ay nagpakilala na ng malabis na kaduagan at hamak na kaasalan ng alipin sa kanyang pagpapahirap at malimit na pagpatay sa makapal na kalahing hindi nagsisilaban. Yaong pagpapasunog nito sa mga bayan, yaong paglapatasngan at pagdungis sa capurihan ng mga babai na di na pinacundanganan ang canilang cahinaan, yaong pagkitil ng buhay ng mga matatandang hindi na macausad at sangol na sumususo pa, na cailan may hindi aasalin at gagawin ng sino pa mang lalaking may puri at may tapang, ay humihingi ng isang masiglang paghihiganti at matinding caparusahan.

    Sa inyong pamimiyapis mangyayaring abutin ang cayo’y tanghalin bangkay sa gitna ng parang ng pakikidigma; ngunit ito’y isang kapurihang inyong maipapamana sa ating Bayan, sa ating lahi, at sa ating angkan.
    Dapat naman ninyong mabatid, na ang kadahilanan ng ating paggugugol ng lalong mahalaga sa loob at sampu ng ingat na buhay, ay ng upang tamuhin at kamtan yaong linalayong Kalayaan ng ating Bayang tinubuan na siyang magbibigay ng buong caginhawaan at magbabangon ng ating kapurihan na ilinugmok ng kaalinpinan sa hukay ng kadustaang walang makatulad.

    Sasagi kaya sa iniyong loob ang panlolomo at aabutin ang panghihinayang na mamatay sa kadahilanang ito? Hindi, hindi! Sapagka’t nakikintal sa inyong gunita yaang libolibong kinitil na buhay ng mapanganyayang kamay ng Kastila, yaong daing, yaong himutoc at pananangis ng mga pinapangulila ng kanilang kalupitan, yaong mga kapatid nating nangapipiit sa kalagimlagim na bilanguan at nagtiis ng walang awang pagpapahirap, yaong walang tilang pag agos ng luha ng mga nawalay sa piling ng kanilang mga anac, asawa at matatandang magulang na itinapon sa iab’t ibang malalayong lupa at ang katampalasanang pagpatay sa ating pinakiibig na kababayan na si M. Jose Rizal, ay nagbukas sa ating puso ng isang sugat na kailan pa ma’y di mababahaw. Lahat ng ito ay sukat ng magpaningas sa lalong malamig na dugo at magbunsod sa atin sa pakikihamok sa hamak na Kastila na nag bibigay sa ating ng lahat ng kahirapan at kamatayan.

    Kaya mga kapatid, igayak ang loob sa pakikipaglaban at paasasahan ang pagtatagumpay, sapagka’t na sa atin ang tunay na katuiran at kabanalang gawa; ang Kastila, isyang kasuklamsuklan na lahing dito’y napasuot ang taning ipinaglalaban, ay ang maling katuirang panggagaga at panlulupig dito sa di nila bayan.

    Sa lahat ng ito, ng malubos ang kabanalan at kapurihan ng ating lahi, ng tanghalin ng Sandaigdigan ang kamahalan ng ating kalooban, ay huag nating tularan ang kalabang Kastila sa pagkahamak ng asal na ugaling gamit sa pakikidigma, huag tayong makipaghamok sa kaibigan lamang pumatay, kundi sa pagtatanggol ng Kalayaan ng ating Bayan, at abutin sa mahigpit na pagkakayakap nating mga anak ng Bayan, ay maihiyaw ng buong lakas na Mabuhay! Mabuhay! Ang Haring Bayang Katagalugan!

    Andres Bonfacio

    Source: Aguinaldo and the Revolution of 1896: A Documentary History, by Pedro S. de Achutegui, S.J. and Miguel A. Bernad, S. J., Ateneo de Manila, 1972. p. 328

    As part of 20 Speeches that Moved a Nation by Manuel L. Quezon III, 2002

    2016 Presidential Elections – Grace Poe could be the real alternative to Trapos

    Those who know me and my politics may be surprised by the title of this post. The words to follow may even be more surprising but since Binay’s resignation from the Cabinet has signaled the start of the election season, it’s high time we begin to seriously consider our options for the upcoming Presidential elections in 2016.

    Surveys not withstanding, Binay would not get my vote. Let me take this moment to tell the world that I love my wife, very much. It’s no longer an issue of whether the allegations of massive corruption and plunder are true or not, Binay for me simply represents another family from a collection of oligarchs who is eager for its turn to use the highest office in the land to simply enrich themselves further and entrench their political dynasty on the back of millions of poor Filipinos.

    Mar Roxas? Just look at the sad and tragic state of Yolanda survivors now and you’d be afraid of what will happen to the rest of the country if he ever becomes President. Also, the problems of the MRT now began during his term as DOTC Secretary.

    So Why Grace Poe? Fellow blogger and now columnist Tonyo Cruz lays down the basic reasons why an independent Grace Poe would be our best chance of getting our country out of this sh*t hole it has been led straight into by the Aquino administration:

    In one of the hearings she called on the Freedom of Information (FOI) Bill, I personally saw Senator Poe lead with remarkable intelligence and humility as she asked resource speakers her questions and as she listened to their answers. So much unlike other pompous senators, her manner of leading the hearing was very organized but open-minded. Her questions were well thought of. She jots down notes and remembers important points that beg for follow-up questions. She showed and expressed appreciation for correct or better ideas regardless of the source, and thus commanded respect from the invited resource persons.

    The FOI Bill remains a bill, despite Poe’s brilliant leadership in the Senate. Why? Because President Aquino and his allies in the House of Representatives continue to block the very idea of an FOI Law.

    That it is unfortunate that President Aquino refused the passage and enactment of an FOI Law is a gross understatement. Not only is it unfortunate, it is one of the President’s gross acts of betrayal on his much-hyped “Daang Matuwid.”

    In the Senate’s Mamasapano Massacre investigation, Senator Poe stood out along with a few other senators from some of their colleagues who loudly and unapologetically chose to be anti-Muslim, ignorant, and hysterical.

    And who could forget Poe’s low-profile, under-the-radar quest to know the plight of MRT commuters? The public won’t forget that powerful gesture of empathy, and her repeated demands for government to rescue commuters from the awful MRT service.

    Recently, Poe also spoke against over-dependence on the US as the Philippines fights Chinese incursions in the West Philippine Sea. Such patriotic stand provides a sharp contrast with the unapologetic pro-US mendicancy of the Aquino administration.

    On these issues, Poe chose to be on the side of progress and to be an agent of change and empowerment.

    With a lot of good things going for her: she has beaten Binay in the presidential surveys, the issue about her citizenship being a non-issue, and the clear lack of a palatable choice between traditional politicians represented by the Aquino-Conjuanco, Roxas and Binay, it is the best time for people wanting real chance, people who have been frustrated by the false hope of PNoy’s “Daang Matuwid” to rally around Grace Poe and mount a real people’s candidate with a progressive and pragmatic platform of government.

    Tonyo Cruz: National ID and SIM Card registration are a scam

    There’s no problem with having multiple ID cards. The real problem lies in the services linked to those cards: declining budgets, quality, coverage, scope, rising fees, and more expensive premiums. Also: the corruption and mishandling of state workers’ and private sector workers’ pension and health insurance funds. Those are the problems begging to be solved.

    There’s no problem either with non-registration of SIM cards. The real problem lies in the failure of authorities to use all tools at their disposal to dismantle, arrest, and prosecute syndicates. Not to mention the massive surveillance reportedly done by the US National Security Agency against Filipinos.

    If the National ID and mandatory SIM card registration get approved, the people who would be happiest are the crooks – the criminals and their forgers for the new business, the scammers in and out of government, the identity thieves, and those responsible for our real problems: the dismal state of basic services and crimes going unpunished.

    The public should be warned: The National ID and mandatory SIM card registration are scams.

    Tonyo Cruz gives compelling reasons why the proposed National ID and SIM card registration would be an added burden to ordinary Filipinos. Not only an added burden, it would be another tool for violation of rights and oppression.