Iqbal as an alias, what’s the big deal?

Despite the illegal use of a nom de guerre in negotiating with the government, Iqbal’s acts cannot be deemed invalid or illegal, provided they were done with the authority of the MILF, his principal. In point of fact, the MILF leadership has expressly affirmed his authority and the binding effect of his acts. So, what’s the big deal?

Moreover, the government’s peace panel headed by Miriam Coronel Ferrer, including Secretary Teresita Deles, admitted knowledge of Iqbal’s nom de guerre; in fact, they also know his real name. So, his use of a fictitious name is not an issue in assessing the binding effect of his actions.

Besides, once the Bangsamoro Basic Law (BBL) is approved, it would bind the Republic of the Philippines regardless of whether the Comprehensive Agreement on the Bangsamoro he signed is valid or not. Indeed, the BBL—assuming it passes judicial scrutiny—would become part of the law of the land.

Retired Supreme Court Chief Justice Artemio Panganiban recent column on Phil. Daily Inquirer: “What’s in a name?” Really amazed that our lawmakers have made such a big fuss over this, even to the point of stalling the peace process.

Have anything to add?

Loading Facebook Comments ...
Loading Disqus Comments ...

Have anything to add?

Read previous post:
CNET: What you need to know about Wi-Fi calling

Curious about Wi-Fi calling? Or do you have it confused with with other services like Skype, Viber, etc? CNET has...

Close